Saiten MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| GITHUB_TOKEN | No | GitHub token used for authentication. Note that gh CLI usually manages its own auth; this is typically only set for CI environments. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_submissionsA | Fetch the list of Agents League submissions. |
| get_submission_detailA | Fetch detailed submission data for the specified Issue number. |
| get_scoring_rubricA | Return the scoring rubric for the specified track. |
| save_scoresA | Save scoring results to data/scores.json. |
| generate_ranking_reportA | Generate a Markdown ranking report and save to reports/ranking.md. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap. generate_ranking_report creates reports, get_scoring_rubric fetches scoring criteria, get_submission_detail retrieves specific submission data, list_submissions lists submissions with filtering, and save_scores stores scoring results. The tools cover different aspects of the scoring workflow without ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (generate_ranking_report, get_scoring_rubric, get_submission_detail, list_submissions, save_scores). The verbs are appropriate and descriptive, and the snake_case convention is maintained throughout without deviation.
With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing a scoring system for submissions. The tools cover essential operations like listing, retrieving details, accessing rubrics, saving scores, and generating reports, which is appropriate for the domain without being excessive or insufficient.
The toolset provides complete coverage for the scoring workflow domain. It includes operations for listing submissions, fetching details and rubrics, saving scores, and generating reports, covering the full lifecycle from data retrieval to output without any obvious gaps that would hinder an agent.