Saiten MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Saiten MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform GitHub analytics and management tasks, including repository analysis, PR summarization, issue triage, release notes generation, and contributor statistics.44 npmMIT
- -licenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI-driven orchestration of GitHub development workflows including automated issue analysis, code generation, code review, and PR creation through multiple specialized agents. Integrates with GitHub Actions to automate the complete development process from issue to pull request.7-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to orchestrate the full software development lifecycle on GitHub, including planning, issue creation, code review, security triage, and release readiness checks.1337 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, code, and more through a comprehensive set of tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to evaluate real OSS contribution opportunities by scoring issues on availability, competing PRs, staleness, and maintainer sentiment, including live feasibility checks for any repository.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with GitHub (search repos, read files, issues, PRs), analyze code for quality and issues, and manage tasks with priority sorting.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap. generate_ranking_report creates reports, get_scoring_rubric fetches scoring criteria, get_submission_detail retrieves specific submission data, list_submissions lists submissions with filtering, and save_scores stores scoring results. The tools cover different aspects of the scoring workflow without ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (generate_ranking_report, get_scoring_rubric, get_submission_detail, list_submissions, save_scores). The verbs are appropriate and descriptive, and the snake_case convention is maintained throughout without deviation.
With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing a scoring system for submissions. The tools cover essential operations like listing, retrieving details, accessing rubrics, saving scores, and generating reports, which is appropriate for the domain without being excessive or insufficient.
The toolset provides complete coverage for the scoring workflow domain. It includes operations for listing submissions, fetching details and rubrics, saving scores, and generating reports, covering the full lifecycle from data retrieval to output without any obvious gaps that would hinder an agent.