wiki_move_node

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

没有注解信息，描述需承担全部行为披露。描述提到可跨知识库，但未说明移动是否删除原节点、是否需要权限、是否可逆、对子节点的影响等关键行为。对于移动操作，这些是重要信息，缺失导致透明度不足。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

一句话描述，简洁明了，没有冗余信息，信息密度高，且核心信息前置。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

考虑到没有注解、没有输出 schema，且是移动操作，描述显得过于简洁。缺少对返回值、错误情况、权限要求等上下文的说明。虽然 schema 参数描述完整，但整体上下文仍不充分。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

schema 中对所有 4 个参数提供了描述，覆盖率 100%，基线为 3。描述本身没有额外解释参数，但也没有必要，因为 schema 已经承担了参数含义。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述使用明确的动词“移动”和资源“节点”，并指出可跨知识库，与创建、复制、删除等兄弟工具区分开来。虽然没有明确命名替代工具，但动作清楚，目的明确。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述仅说明功能，没有提供何时使用该工具与替代工具（如 wiki_copy_node 或 wiki_move_docs_to_wiki）的指导。没有例外情况或前置条件，使用场景完全依赖用户推测。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.