bitable_create_app

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'create' with no explanation of side effects, required permissions, whether the operation is reversible, or what the response looks like. As a mutation tool, it lacks transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the verb. It contains no filler, but it is somewhat under-specified. Still, it earns its place and is not tautological.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no annotations, no output schema, and only two parameters, the description is too sparse. It does not mention return values, prerequisites (e.g., whether folder_token is required), or behavior in edge cases. A creation tool with this description is incomplete for an agent to use reliably.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and both parameters have basic descriptions ('多维表格名称' for name and '目标文件夹 token' for folder_token). The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. It does not compensate for any ambiguity but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '创建多维表格应用' clearly states the action (create) and resource (Bitable app), distinguishing it from sibling tools like bitable_create_table (create table) and bitable_create_record (create record). However, it is a brief phrase without additional scope or detail, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., having a folder token) or that this should be used before creating tables/records. No when/when-not guidance is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.