duck-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to duck-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables any AI agent to control a Pollen Robotics Microduck through MCP, including walking, sitting, picking objects, reading health, and stopping, with support for mock, simulated, or real hardware transports.81Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to safely drive a simulated Franka Panda pick-and-place cell through MCP tools, with gated motion, emergency stop, structured errors, and audit logging.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents full control and observability of the Webots robot simulator, enabling launch and monitoring of simulations, reinforcement learning training, model evaluation, and interactive scene manipulation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control a Minecraft bot for movement, building, crafting, and instant schematic-based structure spawning via MCP tools.30 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes MuJoCo physics simulation to AI assistants via 65 MCP tools, enabling natural language control of robotics simulation, trajectory optimization, contact analysis, and video export.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides physics simulation capabilities using PyBullet, enabling 3D physics world creation, object loading, force application, and state monitoring through MCP protocol.-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the duck robot: tricks, state reading, locomotion, perturbation, stopping, head gaze, camera rendering, and reset. Even though duck_stop overlaps slightly with duck_drive(all-zero), the descriptions clearly separate an explicit stop from a velocity command.
All tools share the duck_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, which is easy to follow. However, the suffixes mix verbs (trick, push, reset) with nouns (state, camera), so the naming is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform.
Eight tools is well within the ideal range for a robot-control MCP server. Each tool covers a necessary capability: actuation, sensing, perception, perturbation, and recovery, with no obvious bloat or redundancy.
The tool surface covers the core sim-control loop: inspect state, move, trick, push, look, view, stop, and reset. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated stand-up command and no ball manipulation beyond trick-triggered kicks, but those are explicitly handled via reset or documented limitations.