wordpress_audit_hook_configure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description states it sets parameters and returns resulting status, but lacks details on side effects, idempotency, or response format. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded paragraph with no superfluous text; efficiently covers purpose, parameters, return, and requirement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, low schema coverage, and no annotations, the description is incomplete: missing response format, events parameter details, and error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%; description lists parameters (endpoint_url, secret with length constraint, enabled flag, events) but lacks detailed explanation, especially for 'events' format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it configures the companion plugin's audit-hook webhook, specifying the exact settings (endpoint_url, secret, enabled, events) and distinguishes from related tools like disable and status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It mentions the prerequisite 'Requires manage_options' and implies configuration use case, but does not explicitly contrast with disabling or checking status, though context makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.