lattice_stop_all_worker
Stop all containers running on a specific worker by providing its ID.
Instructions
Stop all containers on a worker
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Worker ID |
Stop all containers running on a specific worker by providing its ID.
Stop all containers on a worker
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Worker ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits like destructiveness, but it only states the basic action without mentioning potential side effects (e.g., data loss, forced stop, or async behavior).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy, directly conveys the action and target.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with one parameter; the description is minimally adequate for basic understanding but lacks details about result, asynchronicity, or safety considerations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the single parameter. The description adds no extra semantic value beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Stop all containers') and the resource ('on a worker'), which distinguishes it from siblings like lattice_stop_container and lattice_stop_stack.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., stopping containers individually), no prerequisites or typical scenarios described.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aidenappl/lattice-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server