lattice_start_container
Start a stopped container by providing its container ID to bring it back online in your orchestration platform.
Instructions
Start a stopped container
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Container ID |
Start a stopped container by providing its container ID to bring it back online in your orchestration platform.
Start a stopped container
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Container ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It implies a state change but doesn't disclose synchronicity, permissions needed, or effects. Lacks behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Highly concise (single sentence), efficient for a simple tool. Could add more value without becoming verbose, but no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the description misses prerequisites (container must exist and be stopped), error conditions, and return behavior. Incomplete for safe autonomous use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (1 param, 'id' described as 'Container ID'). Description adds no extra parameter information beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Start a stopped container' uses a specific verb 'Start' and resource 'container', clearly distinguishing it from siblings like lattice_stop_container, lattice_restart_container, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., when container is stopped, or reasons to use start rather than unpause). No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aidenappl/lattice-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server