Skip to main content
Glama
aidc2026ai-melon

AIDC AI Design Engine

Related Servers

Alternatives to AIDC AI Design Engine

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A physics engine for liquid-cooled GPU systems, exposed as an AI-callable MCP server. Enables thermal analysis, coolant comparison, flow optimization, and rack-level sizing via natural language queries.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides professional-grade data center engineering calculations including cooling, power, GPU thermal optimization, UPS/battery sizing, tier classification, and commissioning workflows, compliant with ASHRAE and Uptime Institute standards.
      8
      19 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic, standards-based calculations for data center critical power infrastructure. Enables site selection, generator sizing, UPS sizing, NFPA 110 compliance, and more via 50+ AI agents and 8 compound chains.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      27 deterministic engineering compliance and calculation tools for the built environment (data-centre PUE and EED, EPBD, NIS2, Eurocode, UAE compliance), callable by AI agents via MCP and REST API. Free tier; every result cites the governing standard.
      27
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      What’s new on DC Hub MCP: seven focused pack endpoints so agents load only the tools for the job — siting, grid, fiber, deals, gas, site lookup, and OpenAI Deep Research (search+fetch). Full catalog still at https://dchub.cloud/mcp (91 tools). Live floors: 21,800+ facilities · 300+ markets · Pro $99/mo. Details: https://dchub.cloud/whats-new
      91
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so no possibility of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, naming consistency is not an issue. The name 'validate' is a clear verb indicating action.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a domain like data center design is insufficient. The tool covers validation but omits other essential operations like design creation or modification.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool only provides validation, missing CRUD operations for designs, listing, or other lifecycle management. The domain suggests a need for more tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues