jingswap_deposit_stx

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It usefully discloses the deposit-phase restriction and human-unit amounts, but omits important behavior such as wallet/auth prerequisites, whether deposits are locked or cancellable via jingswap_cancel_stx, and what happens at settlement.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core action and phase constraint in two tight sentences. The earning_opportunities tip is marginally tangential but does not materially harm readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a financial deposit action with no annotations and no output schema, the description covers the basic inputs and timing condition. It still lacks lifecycle context such as fund lockup, cancellation, authorization requirements, and settlement behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description reinforces human units with examples and clarifies that market determines STX vs USDCx, but adds only limited meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb (deposit), resource (token-B side), and target (current Jingswap auction cycle). It implicitly distinguishes itself from jingswap_deposit_sbtc by specifying STX/USDCx rather than the token-A side, though it does not name the sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States the key timing constraint: "Only works during the deposit phase." However, it does not explicitly contrast with jingswap_deposit_sbtc or tell the agent to check jingswap_get_cycle_state before calling, leaving alternatives and pre-checks implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.