Skip to main content
Glama
ai2robot-network

ros2-mcp

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
AI2ROBOT_ROS2NoEnable ROS2 mode (real topics/services via a Python sidecar). Set to 1 to run with the sidecar.0

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
list_topicsA

List available ROS2 topics.

read_topicB

Read the latest value of a ROS2 topic.

call_serviceB

Call a ROS2 service (e.g. cmd_vel to move the robot).

robot_statusA

Convenience: read status, GPS and telemetry in one call.

wrap_proofC

Wrap current robot telemetry into an ai2robot proof bundle draft (hash-chained action log).

chain_fingerprintA

Return the SHA-256 fingerprint of the proof draft for a task.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the robot: listing topics, reading from a topic, invoking a service, aggregated status, proof bundle creation, and fingerprint hashing. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_topics, read_topic, call_service, wrap_proof), but robot_status and chain_fingerprint are noun phrases, creating a minor deviation. The pattern is still readable and mostly predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Six tools is well-scoped for a ROS2 interface that covers topic access, service calls, telemetry aggregation, and proof generation. The count feels appropriate for the apparent purpose without bloat or thinness.

Completeness3/5

Core functionality like reading topics and calling services is present, but there are notable gaps: no way to publish to topics, no service discovery or type introspection, and no node listing. The proof tools are an extra feature but do not compensate for missing standard ROS2 operations.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues