collection_games_v1_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions the DELETE method and OAuth requirement, and points to a guide resource, but it fails to disclose whether the action is permanent, what the body must contain, or the expected response. This is a significant gap for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, uses three sentences to front-load method/endpoint/purpose, then mentions required body, then auth and a guide pointer. Every sentence carries useful information with no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete tool with no annotations or output schema, the description should explain the request body format and consequences. It only states that body is required and OAuth is needed, then defers to a guide, making it insufficient for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the descriptions are generic (e.g., body is '请求体' without structure). The description only repeats that body is required and OAuth token fallback env vars, adding no real detail beyond the schema, leaving the core body semantics unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states '[DELETE] /collection/games/v1 - Delete from Collection', identifying the HTTP method and resource with a specific verb. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools such as collection_games_v1_get or collection_copies_v1_delete, so it lacks sibling comparison.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides prerequisites by stating '必填: body' and '需要 OAuth Token', which tells the agent what is needed to call the tool. But it doesn't explicitly state when to use this over alternatives or when not to use it; the usage context is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.