tuik_download_table_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the file type and source, but does not mention important behaviors such as overwrite semantics for output_path, file size limits, or authentication/authorization requirements. For a download tool, this is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus a compact argument list. Every sentence earns its place, and the structure is front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple download tool, the description covers the essential context: what is downloaded, where the url comes from, and where the file will be saved. Minor gaps like directory creation, overwriting, and error handling are not addressed, but an output schema exists to cover return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds clear meaning to both parameters: url is defined as the url field of an istab row from specific tools, and output_path includes a file extension example. Since the schema has zero coverage, this is essential value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Download an istab table file (usually Excel) from the TUIK portal' with a specific verb and resource. It is unambiguous even without referencing sibling tools, but it does not explicitly differentiate from other download-related siblings like tuik_download_data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a prerequisite by mentioning the url comes from tuik_list_tables/tuik_search_tables, but it gives no guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives or when not to use it. There are no explicit exclusions or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.