A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenancePredict the cost of an LLM call before you make it, and pick the cheapest model that still does the job, offline, from your editor.
7
27 npm
Apache 2.0
P2predict-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to P2predict-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables engineers to estimate LLM costs, check GPU VRAM fit, audit MCP configs for security risks, and analyze network device config changes and compliance—all locally, with no account or telemetry.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnterprise-grade (40m+ lines) codebase intelligence in a zero-setup, private and local MCP: managed indexing, hybrid semantic search, polyglot code dependency graphs, and DB/API/infra knowledge. Benchmark: 61% less tokens, 84% fewer calls, 37x faster than standard AI grep.264,715 npm3,307AGPL 3.0
OptimToken MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fetch live, dated prices for LLM models and cloud compute instances across providers, compare and recommend models, and estimate monthly costs based on workload-specific token shapes and constraints.MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, compare, and select the best AI models across multiple providers based on pricing, performance, and capabilities, with real-time cost estimation and benchmarking.939 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agent-assisted CAD engineering, allowing users to create, validate, and export CAD designs through natural language, with a deterministic engine that has zero LLM runtime dependency.Academic Free v1.1
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 12 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The prediction tools (predict, predict_batch, predict_from_csv, predict_interval, explain, what_if) have overlapping surface areas but each has a clearly distinct input mode or output focus. The one genuinely close pair is get_model_quality and generate_report; their descriptions do distinguish structured JSON from PDF generation, but an agent could still hesitate.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a clear snake_case verb or verb_noun pattern, and the predict_* family is consistently named. Minor deviations like 'explain' and 'what_if' break the pattern slightly but remain readable and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Twelve tools is well within the ideal range and each tool covers a distinct stage of the model workflow: discovery, training, prediction variants, explanation, quality assessment, and reporting. No tool feels redundant enough to remove.
Completeness4/5
The set covers model discovery, training, single/batch prediction, intervals, what-if analysis, explanation, quality review, and PDF reporting—very complete for a prediction-focused server. The main gaps are missing model deletion/update operations and a direct model-comparison tool, but these are not core to the stated purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues