Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Atlassian Trello MCP Server

Atlassian Trello MCP Server

by agrath
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

trello_get_check_item

Retrieve a specific check item from a Trello checklist by providing checklist ID and check item ID.

Instructions

Get a single check item from a checklist.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "checklistId": "<checklistId>",
      "checkItemId": "<checkItemId>"
    },
    "name": "trello_get_check_item"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
apiKeyNoTrello API key (optional if TRELLO_API_KEY env var is set)
tokenNoTrello API token (optional if TRELLO_TOKEN env var is set)
checklistIdYesID of the checklist
checkItemIdYesID of the check item

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.2.1

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description is the sole source of behavioral info. It correctly indicates a read operation via 'Get', but lacks details on error handling, permissions, or response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no extraneous words, effectively front-loading the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with no output schema, the description provides the essential purpose. However, it could be improved by mentioning the return object (the check item) and any default behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, so the description adds no extra meaning beyond the parameter names and descriptions already present. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'single check item from a checklist', distinguishing it from sibling tools like trello_get_check_items and trello_create_check_item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage is implied by the name and description (to retrieve one specific check item), but no explicit guidance on when to use over alternatives like trello_get_check_items for all items or trello_update_check_item for modifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools