Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Atlassian Trello MCP Server

Atlassian Trello MCP Server

by agrath
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

trello_delete_checklist

Delete a checklist from a Trello card by providing its ID. Removes the checklist and its items.

Instructions

Delete a checklist from a card.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "checklistId": "<checklistId>"
    },
    "name": "trello_delete_checklist"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
apiKeyNoTrello API key (optional if TRELLO_API_KEY env var is set)
tokenNoTrello API token (optional if TRELLO_TOKEN env var is set)
checklistIdYesID of the checklist to delete

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.2.1

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Delete' which implies destructive action, but it does not clarify that the deletion is permanent, what happens to any associated check items, or whether any permissions are required. This leaves gaps in understanding the tool's effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence of five words. It is extremely concise and front-loaded, with no unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description should ideally provide context on prerequisites, irreversible nature, and error conditions. It fails to do so, leaving the agent with incomplete understanding for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all three parameters, including required fields. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'a checklist from a card', making it easy for an AI agent to understand its primary function. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_checklist' or 'update_checklist'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites (e.g., the checklist must exist and the card must be accessible). An AI agent would benefit from knowing that this is for removing checklists that are no longer needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools