Skip to main content
Glama
agileandy

MCP Secure Local Server

by agileandy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Secure Local Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Server

      sdirishguy
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A secure Model Context Protocol server providing HTTP endpoints for AI agent tool execution, including file system operations, shell commands, and LLM-based code generation.
      1
      -

    • MCP Toolkit

      zxfgds
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with file systems, databases, GitHub repositories, web resources, and system tools while maintaining security and control.
      23 npm
      2
      MIT

    • stela-mcp

      Sachin-Bhat
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for secure local system operations, enabling shell command execution and file management via a standardized interface.
      14
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • MCPwner

      nedlir
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for security research automation, integrating multiple security testing tools into LLM-driven workflows for secret scanning, static analysis, and vulnerability discovery.
      55
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set has clear distinct purposes for most tools, but some overlap exists, such as 'close_bug' being a convenience wrapper for 'update_bug', which could cause confusion in selection. However, descriptions help clarify these relationships, and tools like 'configure_figma_stories' and 'generate_user_stories' are well-differentiated within their domain.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, such as 'add_bug', 'get_bug', 'list_bugs', and 'update_bug', with minor deviations like 'configure_figma_stories' and 'preview_user_stories' that still maintain readability. The naming is largely predictable and coherent across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 15 tools, the count is well-scoped for a server handling bug tracking, Figma integration, and general utilities. Each tool appears to earn its place by covering specific operations without feeling excessive or thin for the apparent scope of the server.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides good coverage for bug tracking with CRUD operations and additional features like searching and configuration. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for deleting bugs or managing Figma projects beyond the listed operations, but agents can likely work around these with the available tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources