Skip to main content
Glama

secure_run_command_sequence

Run multiple commands in sequence with security restrictions, configurable timeouts, and stop-on-error behavior. Optionally auto-commit results to Git with a custom message.

Instructions

Execute multiple commands in sequence with security restrictions

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
commandsYesArray of commands to execute in sequence
cwdNoWorking directory for all commands
timeoutNoTimeout per command in milliseconds
commitResultNoAuto-commit after successful sequence
commitMessageNoCustom commit message
stopOnErrorNoStop execution on first error (default: true)
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description mentions 'security restrictions' but does not detail what those are. Behavioral traits like stop-on-error behavior, timeout handling, or commit behavior are not disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (single sentence) but lacks structure. It could be improved by breaking into bullet points or providing more detail without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain return values, error handling, or the nature of security restrictions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are documented. The description adds no additional semantic insight beyond the schema, resulting in baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool executes multiple commands in sequence with security restrictions. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'run_command' or 'secure_run_command'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Missing context on prerequisites, typical use cases, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/agentics-ai/code-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server