Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Code MCP Server

Code MCP Server

by agentics-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

generate_sample_config

Create a sample .vscode-mcp.toml configuration file for your VS Code MCP server. Optionally save it directly to your project directory.

Instructions

Generate a sample .vscode-mcp.toml configuration file

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "generate_sample_config"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
saveToFileNoSave generated config to .vscode-mcp.toml

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv2.0.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without revealing side effects (e.g., whether it writes to disk by default, overwrites existing files, or requires permissions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description should provide more context (e.g., default behavior, where the config appears, what it contains). It is insufficient for a tool that likely supports onboarding or configuration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema. The schema already describes 'saveToFile' as saving to file. Baseline 3 is appropriate; no added value from description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'generate' and the resource 'a sample .vscode-mcp.toml configuration file', effectively distinguishing it from siblings like 'generate_docker_compose'. However, it does not mention the behavior of the 'saveToFile' parameter, which modifies the output.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. Given the sibling tools in the config generation space, some context would help.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools