Skip to main content
Glama
agenticcontrolio

TwinCAT Validator MCP Server

by agenticcontrolio
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to TwinCAT Validator MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • festo-codesys-mcp

      efranceschetti
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that turns AI assistants into competent Festo/CODESYS PLC engineers by grounding them in curated, manufacturer-accurate knowledge and forcing every artifact through a machine-checked validation pipeline for CODESYS import.
      18
      18 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Swarm Orchestrator

      Of-Arte
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that extends AI coding assistants with deterministic, algorithmic capabilities such as code analysis, fault localization, and formal verification, enabling an autonomous engineering team within the IDE.
      MIT

    • te1000-mcp

      Edge-JB
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Beckhoff TwinCAT XAE / TE1000 Automation Interface, enabling control of XAE Shell, TwinCAT tree manipulation, PLC operations, and build actions via natural language.
      25
      12
      MIT

    • tiacommander-mcp

      a4webdev
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to Siemens TIA Portal via the Openness API. AI-assisted PLC programming, project management, hardware configuration, cross-reference analysis, and deployment. 19 tools, 230 actions.
      35
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap between tools, particularly between autofix_batch/autofix_file, validate_batch/validate_file, and process_twincat_batch/process_twincat_single which appear to be batch vs single-file versions of the same core operations. However, the descriptions help clarify the scope differences, and tools like extract_methods_to_xml, generate_skeleton, and get_context_pack have distinct purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structure (e.g., validate_file, generate_skeleton, get_context_pack). The main deviation is check_specific which uses an adjective_verb pattern rather than verb_noun, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    16 tools is borderline high for a TwinCAT validation server, especially given the redundancy between batch and single-file versions. The server could likely consolidate some overlapping tools without losing functionality, making the count feel somewhat heavy for the domain scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for TwinCAT validation workflows including validation (single/batch), fixing (single/batch), policy management, knowledge retrieval, skeleton generation, and specialized operations like method extraction. There are no obvious gaps - it supports the full lifecycle from creation to troubleshooting to verification.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources