Skip to main content
Glama

create_text

Add text elements to Figma designs with precise positioning, styling, and formatting options for labels, annotations, and interface text.

Instructions

Create a new text element in Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
xYesX position
yYesY position
textYesText content
fontSizeNoFont size (default: 14)
fontWeightNoFont weight (e.g., 400 for Regular, 700 for Bold)
fontColorNoFont color in RGBA format
nameNoOptional name for the text node by default following text
parentIdNoOptional parent node ID to append the text to

Implementation Reference

  • Core registration of the 'create_text' MCP tool, including description, Zod input schema (positions, text, styling options), and handler logic that forwards to Figma's websocket command with defaults and returns structured response.
    server.tool(
      "create_text",
      "Create a new text element in Figma",
      {
        x: z.number().describe("X position"),
        y: z.number().describe("Y position"),
        text: z.string().describe("Text content"),
        fontSize: z.number().optional().describe("Font size (default: 14)"),
        fontWeight: z
          .number()
          .optional()
          .describe("Font weight (e.g., 400 for Regular, 700 for Bold)"),
        fontColor: z
          .object({
            r: z.number().min(0).max(1).describe("Red component (0-1)"),
            g: z.number().min(0).max(1).describe("Green component (0-1)"),
            b: z.number().min(0).max(1).describe("Blue component (0-1)"),
            a: z
              .number()
              .min(0)
              .max(1)
              .optional()
              .describe("Alpha component (0-1)"),
          })
          .optional()
          .describe("Font color in RGBA format"),
        name: z
          .string()
          .optional()
          .describe("Optional name for the text node by default following text"),
        parentId: z
          .string()
          .optional()
          .describe("Optional parent node ID to append the text to"),
      },
      async ({ x, y, text, fontSize, fontWeight, fontColor, name, parentId }) => {
        try {
          const result = await sendCommandToFigma("create_text", {
            x,
            y,
            text,
            fontSize: fontSize || 14,
            fontWeight: fontWeight || 400,
            fontColor: fontColor || { r: 0, g: 0, b: 0, a: 1 },
            name: name || "Text",
            parentId,
          });
          const typedResult = result as { name: string; id: string };
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Created text "${typedResult.name}" with ID: ${typedResult.id}`,
              },
            ],
          };
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error creating text: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`,
              },
            ],
          };
        }
      }
    );
  • Intermediate registration call to registerCreationTools which includes the create_text tool.
    registerCreationTools(server);
  • Top-level registration call to registerTools aggregator which includes creation tools containing create_text.
    registerTools(server);
  • Type definition for FigmaCommand union including 'create_text' used in websocket communications.
    | "create_text"
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only states the basic action without behavioral details. It doesn't mention whether this requires specific permissions, if it's destructive (creates new elements), what happens on failure, or typical response format. 'Create' implies mutation but lacks context about side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with zero wasted words. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource, making it immediately scannable and efficient for an AI agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation tool with 8 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't address what the tool returns, error conditions, or how it differs from related text manipulation tools. The agent would need to infer too much from the schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter information beyond what's already in the schema (which has 100% coverage). It doesn't explain relationships between parameters (e.g., how x/y position relates to parentId) or provide usage examples. With complete schema coverage, the baseline is 3 even without additional param details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('create') and resource ('new text element in Figma'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate this from other creation tools like create_rectangle or create_ellipse, which would require mentioning it's specifically for text elements with formatting capabilities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of sibling tools like set_text_content (for modifying existing text) or set_text_style_id (for applying styles), nor any context about prerequisites like needing a parent frame or being in edit mode.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/agenisea/cc-fig-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server