Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CC Fig MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 50 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific Figma operations like shape creation, styling, or node management, with clear boundaries. However, some overlap exists, such as set_fill_color, set_fill_style_id, and set_fill_variable, which could cause confusion about when to use each for fill operations, though descriptions help clarify their differences.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as create_rectangle, get_node_info, and set_font_size. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and select tools based on their intended actions and targets in the Figma domain.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 50 tools, the count is excessive for a typical MCP server, leading to cognitive overload and potential inefficiency. While Figma is a complex domain, this many tools suggests over-fragmentation of operations, such as having multiple separate tools for text styling (e.g., set_font_size, set_font_weight) that could be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of Figma operations, including CRUD for nodes (create, delete, move, resize), styling (fills, strokes, effects, text properties), component management, variable handling, and utilities like export and grouping. No obvious gaps are present for core design workflows in the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive