mcp-server-pexels
mcp-server-pexels
Pexels 스톡 사진 및 동영상 검색을 위한 MCP 서버입니다. LLM에 최적화되어 있습니다.
Pexels는 무료 스톡 사진과 동영상을 제공합니다.
기능
사진 검색 — 필터(검색어, 방향, 크기, 색상, 로케일)를 사용하여 사진 검색
동영상 검색 — 동영상 검색, 1920x1080에 가장 가까운 HD .mp4 자동 선택
상세 정보 가져오기 — ID를 통해 사진/동영상의 전체 메타데이터 검색
지능형 캐싱 — 검색 시 10분 TTL, ID 조회 시 60분 TTL 적용
오류 처리 — 유용한 메시지와 함께 정상적인 실패 처리 (MCP 모범 사례 준수)
출처 표기 — 모든 결과에 사진작가 크레딧 필수 포함
Related MCP server: Pexels MCP Server
사전 요구 사항
Node.js v20 이상
Pexels API 키 (pexels.com/api에서 무료 발급)
빠른 시작 (2분)
1. API 키 발급
pexels.com/api에서 가입하세요. 무료이며 신용카드가 필요하지 않습니다.
2. 서버 빌드
npm install && npm run build3. Claude Desktop에 추가
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (Mac) 또는 %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows) 파일을 열고 다음을 추가하세요:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pexels": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp-server-pexels/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"PEXELS_API_KEY": "YOUR_PEXELS_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}Windows 참고:
node.exe의 전체 경로를 사용하거나 Node를 PATH에 추가하세요. Windows에서도 경로에 슬래시(/)를 사용할 수 있습니다.
4. Claude Desktop 재시작
이제 pexels_search_photos, pexels_search_videos, pexels_get_details를 서버에서 사용할 수 있습니다.
구성
.mcp.json 또는 claude_desktop_config.json에 추가하세요:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pexels": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"PEXELS_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}환경 변수
환경 변수에 PEXELS_API_KEY를 설정하세요. 로컬 개발을 위해 .env 파일을 생성하세요:
PEXELS_API_KEY=your_pexels_api_key개발
npm run dev # watch mode
npm run inspector # MCP Inspector
npm test # run tests도구
도구 | 설명 |
| 검색어로 사진 검색 |
| 동영상 검색 |
| ID와 유형으로 상세 정보 가져오기 |
아키텍처
src/index.ts— 진입점, MCP 서버 설정src/tools/— 도구 구현src/shared/— 캐시, API 클라이언트, 오류, 타입, 동영상 선택기src/utils/— Zod 유효성 검사 스키마
엔지니어링 결정
결정 | 근거 |
캐시 우선 아키텍처 | Pexels API는 시간당 200회 요청을 허용합니다. 캐싱(검색 시 10분 TTL, ID 조회 시 60분 TTL)은 할당량을 보존하고, 캐시 적중 시 지연 시간을 5ms 미만으로 줄이며, 에이전트가 동일한 컨텍스트를 자주 재요청하는 프로덕션 AI 시스템에서 중요한 API 비용 인식을 보여줍니다. |
호출 시 즉시 실패(Fail-fast) | MCP 서버는 자식 프로세스로 생성되므로 시작 시점에 실패해서는 안 됩니다. 서버는 시작 시 경고를 표시하지만, 첫 번째 도구 호출 시 구조화된 |
Zod 유효성 검사 스키마 | MCP v2 SDK는 |
미디어용 resource_link | 원격 이미지와 동영상은 적절한 mimeType을 가진 MCP |
순수 동영상 선택 | 동영상 선택 로직은 |
하드코딩된 출처 표기 | Pexels 서비스 약관에 따라 필수입니다. 모든 텍스트 응답에 포함됩니다. |
호환성
StdioClientTransport를 통해 @modelcontextprotocol/sdk v1.29+와 테스트되었습니다. 통합 테스트 스위트는 빌드된 서버를 생성하고 모든 도구 호출을 SDK의 CallToolResultSchema 및 ContentBlockSchema에 대해 검증합니다.
모든 성공적인 응답의 마지막 콘텐츠 요소에는 타입이 지정된 데이터(id, kind, creatorName, dimensions, URLs)를 포함하는 구조화된 JSON 블록이 추가됩니다. 다운스트림 클라이언트와 에이전트 프레임워크는 마크다운 텍스트를 정규식으로 파싱하는 대신 이 블록을 직접 파싱할 수 있습니다. |
향후 개선 사항
도구 실행 텔레메트리 — 캐시 적중/미적중, 쿼리 실행 시간, 오류율에 대한 구조화된 로깅을 추가합니다. 이는 프로덕션 환경에서 AI 에이전트의 문제 해결을 지원하고 관측 가능성 모범 사례를 보여줍니다. |
메트릭 엔드포인트 — 모니터링을 위해 카운터(처리된 요청, 캐시 적중률, 남은 API 할당량)를 노출합니다. |
사용자 지정 TTL 구성 — 사용자가 환경 변수를 통해 캐시 TTL을 조정할 수 있도록 합니다. |
커뮤니티 기여
환영합니다! 🌟
라이선스
비공식 커뮤니티 프로젝트입니다. Pexels와 관련이 없습니다.
Available Tools
3 toolspexels_get_detailsGet Pexels DetailsARead-onlyIdempotent
Get detailed information about a specific photo or video by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| force_refresh | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, and idempotent behavior. The description adds that it returns 'detailed information' but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits like rate limits or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with three parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It fails to hint at the output format or behavior of the optional 'force_refresh' parameter, leaving some gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate. It only mentions 'by ID', leaving parameters like 'type' and 'force_refresh' unexplained. While the enum for type provides some guidance, the description adds minimal value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Get', resource 'detailed information about a specific photo or video', and method 'by ID'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling search tools (pexels_search_photos, pexels_search_videos) which query by keywords.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a specific ID is known, contrasting with search tools. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
pexels_search_photosSearch Pexels PhotosARead-onlyIdempotent
Search for stock photos by query with optional filters for orientation, size, color, and locale. Returns 3-5 results with mandatory photographer attribution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| orientation | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| color | No | ||
| locale | No | ||
| per_page | No | ||
| force_refresh | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | |
| kind | Yes | |
| creatorName | Yes | |
| creatorUrl | Yes | |
| pageUrl | Yes | |
| previewUrl | Yes | |
| mediaUrl | Yes | |
| mediaMimeType | Yes | |
| dimensions | Yes | |
| avgColor | Yes | |
| alt | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, and idempotent behavior. The description adds valuable behavioral details: returns 3-5 results and requires photographer attribution, which goes beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, extremely concise, with no filler. Every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the presence of an output schema and annotations, the description covers core functionality well. It lacks mention of per_page and force_refresh, but is otherwise sufficient for a search tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions four optional filters (orientation, size, color, locale), adding semantic context that they are filters. However, it omits per_page and force_refresh, and schema coverage is 0%. The added value is marginal.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Search for stock photos by query with optional filters', specifying verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings (pexels_get_details for individual photos, pexels_search_videos for videos) by focusing on photo search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While the purpose is clear, the description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings or alternatives. Usage is implied but not contrasted.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
pexels_search_videosSearch Pexels VideosARead-onlyIdempotent
Search for stock videos by query with optional filters. Returns HD-quality .mp4 links with mandatory attribution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| orientation | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| locale | No | ||
| per_page | No | ||
| force_refresh | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | |
| kind | Yes | |
| creatorName | Yes | |
| creatorUrl | Yes | |
| pageUrl | Yes | |
| previewUrl | Yes | |
| mediaUrl | Yes | |
| mediaMimeType | Yes | |
| dimensions | Yes | |
| durationSeconds | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already signal read-only, non-destructive, idempotent behavior. The description adds value by disclosing that results are HD-quality .mp4 links with mandatory attribution, which are not implied by annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action and key details. Every word earns its place with no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The output schema exists, covering return values. The description adds helpful context on output format and attribution. Missing aspects like pagination and enum specifics are minor given overall clarity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description provides no individual parameter explanations. It only mentions 'optional filters' generically, failing to compensate for the missing schema descriptions of the 6 parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches for stock videos by query with optional filters. It mentions HD-quality .mp4 links and mandatory attribution, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like pexels_search_photos (photos) and pexels_get_details (details).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for video searches via 'stock videos' and optional filters, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings. However, the tool name and context signals make the distinction clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- Changed
pexels_search_photos1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "alt": { + "type": "string" + }, + "avgColor": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorName": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "height": { + "type": "number" + }, + "width": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "width", + "height" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "id": { + "type": "number" + }, + "kind": { + "const": "photo", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaMimeType": { + "const": "image/jpeg", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "pageUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "previewUrl": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "kind", + "creatorName", + "creatorUrl", + "pageUrl", + "previewUrl", + "mediaUrl", + "mediaMimeType", + "dimensions", + "avgColor", + "alt" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
pexels_search_videos1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "creatorName": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "height": { + "type": "number" + }, + "width": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "width", + "height" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "durationSeconds": { + "type": "number" + }, + "id": { + "type": "number" + }, + "kind": { + "const": "video", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaMimeType": { + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "pageUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "previewUrl": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "kind", + "creatorName", + "creatorUrl", + "pageUrl", + "previewUrl", + "mediaUrl", + "mediaMimeType", + "dimensions", + "durationSeconds" + ], + "type": "object" +}
3 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
pexels_get_details - First observed
pexels_search_photos - First observed
pexels_search_videos
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: searching photos, searching videos, and getting details by ID. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent 'pexels_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case, making it predictable for an agent to infer functionality.
Three tools is minimal but appropriate for a focused image/video search service. It covers the core workflow without unnecessary bloat.
The set covers search and retrieval of photos and videos, but lacks features like curated collections or trending content, which are minor omissions.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search photos/videos; manage collections, people and duplicates. Requires paid OwAI Cloud Access.
Find free-to-use stock photos by words, by image or by similarity; every result names its licence.
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Image Search: Fast and Simple Image Search API. You can get 100+ search results in one query!.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that extracts images from URLs or base64 data and converts them into a format suitable for LLM analysis, allowing AI models to process and understand visual content.3952 npm21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving high-quality stock photos from Pexels with advanced filtering options including orientation, size, color, and localization support.29 npmISC
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI models to search and retrieve photos, videos, and collections from Pexels via the Pexels API.1129 npm9ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and displaying high-quality, royalty-free photos from Pexels directly in ChatGPT conversations via an interactive gallery widget.2-