mcp-server-pexels
mcp-server-pexels
Un servidor MCP para la búsqueda de fotos y vídeos de stock de Pexels. Optimizado para LLMs.
Pexels proporciona fotos y vídeos de stock gratuitos.
Características
Búsqueda de fotos — Busca fotos con filtros (consulta, orientación, tamaño, color, idioma)
Búsqueda de vídeos — Busca vídeos, selecciona automáticamente el .mp4 en HD más cercano a 1920x1080
Obtener detalles — Recupera los metadatos completos de una foto/vídeo por ID
Caché inteligente — TTL de 10 min para búsquedas, 60 min para consultas por ID
Gestión de errores — Fallos controlados con mensajes útiles (según las mejores prácticas de MCP)
Atribución — Créditos obligatorios del fotógrafo en cada resultado
Related MCP server: Pexels MCP Server
Requisitos previos
Node.js v20+
Clave API de Pexels (gratuita en pexels.com/api)
Inicio rápido (2 minutos)
1. Obtén una clave API
Regístrate en pexels.com/api — es gratis, no requiere tarjeta de crédito.
2. Construye el servidor
npm install && npm run build3. Añádelo a Claude Desktop
Abre ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (Mac) o %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json (Windows), y añade:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pexels": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp-server-pexels/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"PEXELS_API_KEY": "YOUR_PEXELS_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}Nota para Windows: Usa la ruta completa de
node.exeo añade Node al PATH. Las barras inclinadas hacia adelante funcionan en Windows.
4. Reinicia Claude Desktop
El servidor ahora está disponible como pexels_search_photos, pexels_search_videos y pexels_get_details.
Configuración
Añade a tu .mcp.json o claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pexels": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"PEXELS_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}Entorno
Establece PEXELS_API_KEY en tu entorno. Para desarrollo local, crea un archivo .env:
PEXELS_API_KEY=your_pexels_api_keyDesarrollo
npm run dev # watch mode
npm run inspector # MCP Inspector
npm test # run testsHerramientas
Herramienta | Descripción |
| Buscar fotos por consulta |
| Buscar vídeos |
| Obtener detalles por ID y tipo |
Arquitectura
src/index.ts— Punto de entrada, configuración del servidor MCPsrc/tools/— Implementaciones de herramientassrc/shared/— Caché, cliente API, errores, tipos, selector de vídeosrc/utils/— Esquemas de validación Zod
Decisiones de ingeniería
Decisión | Justificación |
Arquitectura basada en caché | La API de Pexels permite 200 solicitudes/hora. El almacenamiento en caché (TTL de 10m para búsquedas, 60m para consultas por ID) preserva la cuota, reduce la latencia a <5ms en aciertos de caché y demuestra conciencia de los costes de la API, algo crítico para sistemas de IA de producción donde los agentes solicitan frecuentemente el mismo contexto. |
Fallo rápido en tiempo de llamada | Los servidores MCP se generan como procesos secundarios; el inicio no es el momento para fallar. El servidor advierte al inicio pero falla de forma controlada en la primera llamada a la herramienta con un |
Esquemas de validación Zod | El SDK de MCP v2 requiere envoltorios |
resource_link para medios | Las imágenes y vídeos remotos se proporcionan como bloques de contenido |
Selección de vídeo pura | Lógica de selección de vídeo aislada en |
Atribución codificada | Requerida por los Términos de Servicio de Pexels. Integrada en cada respuesta de texto. |
Compatibilidad
Probado con @modelcontextprotocol/sdk v1.29+ a través de StdioClientTransport. El conjunto de pruebas de integración genera el servidor compilado y valida cada llamada a la herramienta contra CallToolResultSchema y ContentBlockSchema del SDK.
Se añade un bloque JSON estructurado como último elemento de contenido en cada respuesta exitosa, que contiene datos tipados (id, tipo, nombre del creador, dimensiones, URLs). Los clientes intermedios y los marcos de trabajo de agentes pueden analizar este bloque directamente en lugar de analizar el texto markdown mediante expresiones regulares.
Mejoras futuras
Telemetría de ejecución de herramientas — Añadir registro estructurado para aciertos/fallos de caché, tiempo de ejecución de consultas y tasas de error. Esto ayuda a solucionar problemas de agentes de IA en producción y demuestra las mejores prácticas de observabilidad.
Punto final de métricas — Exponer contadores (solicitudes atendidas, tasa de aciertos de caché, cuota de API restante) para monitorización.
Configuración de TTL personalizada — Permitir a los usuarios ajustar el TTL de la caché mediante variables de entorno.
Contribuciones de la comunidad
¡Son bienvenidas! 🌟
Licencia
Proyecto comunitario no oficial. No afiliado a Pexels.
Available Tools
3 toolspexels_get_detailsGet Pexels DetailsARead-onlyIdempotent
Get detailed information about a specific photo or video by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| force_refresh | No |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, and idempotent behavior. The description adds that it returns 'detailed information' but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits like rate limits or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with three parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It fails to hint at the output format or behavior of the optional 'force_refresh' parameter, leaving some gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate. It only mentions 'by ID', leaving parameters like 'type' and 'force_refresh' unexplained. While the enum for type provides some guidance, the description adds minimal value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Get', resource 'detailed information about a specific photo or video', and method 'by ID'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling search tools (pexels_search_photos, pexels_search_videos) which query by keywords.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a specific ID is known, contrasting with search tools. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternative tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
pexels_search_photosSearch Pexels PhotosARead-onlyIdempotent
Search for stock photos by query with optional filters for orientation, size, color, and locale. Returns 3-5 results with mandatory photographer attribution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| orientation | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| color | No | ||
| locale | No | ||
| per_page | No | ||
| force_refresh | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | |
| kind | Yes | |
| creatorName | Yes | |
| creatorUrl | Yes | |
| pageUrl | Yes | |
| previewUrl | Yes | |
| mediaUrl | Yes | |
| mediaMimeType | Yes | |
| dimensions | Yes | |
| avgColor | Yes | |
| alt | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, and idempotent behavior. The description adds valuable behavioral details: returns 3-5 results and requires photographer attribution, which goes beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, extremely concise, with no filler. Every word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the presence of an output schema and annotations, the description covers core functionality well. It lacks mention of per_page and force_refresh, but is otherwise sufficient for a search tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions four optional filters (orientation, size, color, locale), adding semantic context that they are filters. However, it omits per_page and force_refresh, and schema coverage is 0%. The added value is marginal.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Search for stock photos by query with optional filters', specifying verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings (pexels_get_details for individual photos, pexels_search_videos for videos) by focusing on photo search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While the purpose is clear, the description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings or alternatives. Usage is implied but not contrasted.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
pexels_search_videosSearch Pexels VideosARead-onlyIdempotent
Search for stock videos by query with optional filters. Returns HD-quality .mp4 links with mandatory attribution.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| orientation | No | ||
| size | No | ||
| locale | No | ||
| per_page | No | ||
| force_refresh | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | |
| kind | Yes | |
| creatorName | Yes | |
| creatorUrl | Yes | |
| pageUrl | Yes | |
| previewUrl | Yes | |
| mediaUrl | Yes | |
| mediaMimeType | Yes | |
| dimensions | Yes | |
| durationSeconds | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already signal read-only, non-destructive, idempotent behavior. The description adds value by disclosing that results are HD-quality .mp4 links with mandatory attribution, which are not implied by annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action and key details. Every word earns its place with no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The output schema exists, covering return values. The description adds helpful context on output format and attribution. Missing aspects like pagination and enum specifics are minor given overall clarity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description provides no individual parameter explanations. It only mentions 'optional filters' generically, failing to compensate for the missing schema descriptions of the 6 parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool searches for stock videos by query with optional filters. It mentions HD-quality .mp4 links and mandatory attribution, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like pexels_search_photos (photos) and pexels_get_details (details).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for video searches via 'stock videos' and optional filters, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings. However, the tool name and context signals make the distinction clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- Changed
pexels_search_photos1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "alt": { + "type": "string" + }, + "avgColor": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorName": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "height": { + "type": "number" + }, + "width": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "width", + "height" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "id": { + "type": "number" + }, + "kind": { + "const": "photo", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaMimeType": { + "const": "image/jpeg", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "pageUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "previewUrl": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "kind", + "creatorName", + "creatorUrl", + "pageUrl", + "previewUrl", + "mediaUrl", + "mediaMimeType", + "dimensions", + "avgColor", + "alt" + ], + "type": "object" +}
- Changed
pexels_search_videos1 field changed- changed
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{ + "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "creatorName": { + "type": "string" + }, + "creatorUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "dimensions": { + "additionalProperties": false, + "properties": { + "height": { + "type": "number" + }, + "width": { + "type": "number" + } + }, + "required": [ + "width", + "height" + ], + "type": "object" + }, + "durationSeconds": { + "type": "number" + }, + "id": { + "type": "number" + }, + "kind": { + "const": "video", + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaMimeType": { + "type": "string" + }, + "mediaUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "pageUrl": { + "type": "string" + }, + "previewUrl": { + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": [ + "id", + "kind", + "creatorName", + "creatorUrl", + "pageUrl", + "previewUrl", + "mediaUrl", + "mediaMimeType", + "dimensions", + "durationSeconds" + ], + "type": "object" +}
3 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
pexels_get_details - First observed
pexels_search_photos - First observed
pexels_search_videos
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: searching photos, searching videos, and getting details by ID. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent 'pexels_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case, making it predictable for an agent to infer functionality.
Three tools is minimal but appropriate for a focused image/video search service. It covers the core workflow without unnecessary bloat.
The set covers search and retrieval of photos and videos, but lacks features like curated collections or trending content, which are minor omissions.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search photos/videos; manage collections, people and duplicates. Requires paid OwAI Cloud Access.
Find free-to-use stock photos by words, by image or by similarity; every result names its licence.
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Image Search: Fast and Simple Image Search API. You can get 100+ search results in one query!.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that extracts images from URLs or base64 data and converts them into a format suitable for LLM analysis, allowing AI models to process and understand visual content.3952 npm21MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving high-quality stock photos from Pexels with advanced filtering options including orientation, size, color, and localization support.29 npmISC
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI models to search and retrieve photos, videos, and collections from Pexels via the Pexels API.1129 npm9ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching and displaying high-quality, royalty-free photos from Pexels directly in ChatGPT conversations via an interactive gallery widget.2-