Skip to main content
Glama
afrise

Academic Paper Search MCP Server

by afrise

Related Servers

Alternatives to Academic Paper Search MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and analyze academic papers from multiple sources, fetch metadata and full text, and build structured outputs like literature maps and paper comparisons.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval of academic paper metadata, PDFs, full text, citations, and references by title via Semantic Scholar, arXiv, and other sources.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving academic paper metadata from Semantic Scholar, including paper details, citations, and author information.
      20
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search across multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Semantic Scholar) through a unified interface. Supports advanced filtering, metadata retrieval, PDF downloads, and comprehensive research workflows with citation analysis.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources including arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar. Provides standardized tools compatible with OpenAI Deep Research and ChatGPT connectors.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to search, analyze, and summarize academic research papers in real-time from arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and PubMed. Provides automatic deduplication, citation analysis, and BibTeX generation across multiple research databases.
      46 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools 'search_by_topic' and 'search_papers' have significant overlap in purpose—both search for papers, with only minor differences in parameters. This creates ambiguity, as an agent might struggle to choose between them. The 'fetch_paper_details' tool is distinct, but the two search tools are not clearly differentiated.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: 'fetch_paper_details' uses a verb_noun pattern, while 'search_by_topic' and 'search_papers' use verb_preposition_noun and verb_noun styles, respectively. This inconsistency makes the set less predictable, though the names are still readable and descriptive.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for an academic paper search domain. It lacks essential operations like filtering by author, journal, or citation count, and there's no update or delete functionality, which limits its utility for comprehensive paper management.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is incomplete for academic paper search. It covers basic fetch and search operations but misses key features such as author-based searches, citation tracking, paper categorization, or integration with reference managers. This will likely cause agent failures in complex workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive