generate_governance_block

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only mentions signing and terms without disclosing security implications (private key handling), output format, or side effects. Minimal disclosure beyond what is implied by the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with no filler. Front-loaded with key details, though could benefit from a brief second sentence on security or output.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the return format (e.g., HTML string), handling of optional parameters, or prerequisites (e.g., key generation). Incomplete for effective tool use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 30% schema coverage, the description adds limited value by mentioning 'terms, revocation policy, and content hash' but does not explain the enum options (inference, training, etc.) or how they map to the governance block. The description is too vague to help an agent understand parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Generate' and the resource 'cryptographically signed governance block for embedding in HTML pages', distinguishing it from siblings like create_chained_governance_block and verify_governance_block.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_chained_governance_block or parse_governance_block_html). Lacks context for selection among sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.