create_v2_delegation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It mentions 'mandatory sunset' (matches schema) and 'PolicyContext binding' but doesn't explain side effects, required permissions, or whether it's destructive. Insufficient disclosure for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence front-loading the action and key attributes. No extraneous words, every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite 4 params, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is minimal. It mentions versioning and binding but doesn't explain their implications. Incomplete for a creation tool with potential side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% with clear param descriptions. The description adds 'versioning' and 'PolicyContext binding' but doesn't elaborate on these concepts or link to specific parameters. Adds marginal value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('v2 delegation') and distinguishes key features (versioning, mandatory sunset, PolicyContext binding) from the sibling 'create_delegation' and 'supersede_v2_delegation'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'create_delegation' or 'supersede_v2_delegation'. No context about prerequisites or when to choose v2 over v1.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.