tracecat_update_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states 'update' implying mutation, but does not detail side effects, permission requirements, or reversibility. The mention of a non-existent CIDR allowlist further obscures behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with good front-loading, but the inaccuracy (CIDR allowlist) undermines conciseness by introducing misinformation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 4 parameters, the description is incomplete. It does not mention return value, partial vs full update, or validation behavior, leaving significant gaps for agent usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description lists fields partially overlapping with schema parameters but adds no deeper meaning. It incorrectly includes CIDR allowlist, which may confuse agents.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool updates webhook settings for a workflow, listing fields like status, methods, entrypoint, and CIDR allowlist. However, the input schema does not include a CIDR allowlist parameter, introducing inaccuracy. The verb and resource are clear, but the mismatch reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like tracecat_get_webhook or tracecat_create_webhook_key. With many sibling tools, explicit usage context is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.