tracecat_delete_action
Delete an action from a workflow by providing its action ID and workflow ID.
Instructions
Delete an action from a workflow
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | Yes | Action ID | |
| workflow_id | Yes | Workflow ID |
Delete an action from a workflow by providing its action ID and workflow ID.
Delete an action from a workflow
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | Yes | Action ID | |
| workflow_id | Yes | Workflow ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as irreversibility, required permissions, or potential side effects on the workflow. 'Delete' implies destruction, but no additional context is given.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is concise, though it could be more informative without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a destructive operation, the description is incomplete. It omits critical details like permanence, cascading effects on workflow edges, or confirmation requirements, which are essential for safe agent execution.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters ('Action ID', 'Workflow ID'). The tool description adds no extra meaning or context about parameter relationships or formats, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete an action from a workflow' clearly states the verb (delete) and resource (action from workflow), distinguishing it from sibling tools like tracecat_delete_workflow or tracecat_delete_folder.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, when not to, or how it compares to other delete tools. The agent is left to infer usage from context alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/adrojis/tracecat-mcp-community'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server