Skip to main content
Glama
adityatiwari101104

contribos

by adityatiwari101104
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to contribos

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • oss-skills-mcp

      chiruu12
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Guides AI agents through open-source contribution workflows, from finding issues to submitting PRs, while keeping decision-making and coding with the human contributor.
      2
      MIT

    • oss-autopilot

      costajohnt
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open source contribution manager — tracks PRs across repos, discovers contributable issues, diagnoses CI failures, and drafts maintainer responses. 21 MCP tools, 5 resources, 3 prompts. Ships as CLI, MCP server, and Claude Code plugin.
      20
      17
      MIT

    • contrib-radar

      Bryandero98
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to evaluate real OSS contribution opportunities by scoring issues on availability, competing PRs, staleness, and maintainer sentiment, including live feasibility checks for any repository.
      MIT

    • OpenCollab MCP

      prakhar1605
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables developers to find personalized open-source contributions by analyzing GitHub profiles and matching them with relevant 'good first issues' and beginner-friendly repositories. Provides comprehensive contribution tooling including repository health scoring, setup difficulty assessment, impact estimation, and automated PR planning.
      22
      23
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the contribution workflow (find, policy, brief, setup, diagnose, claim, tone, check, review). Overlaps like check-vs-review and claim-vs-tone are resolved by the descriptions, which clearly bound one to pre-submit local work and the other to open PRs, and one to drafting versus checking text.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the identical contribos_verb pattern with a single lowercase word (policy, brief, setup, diagnose, check, review, claim, tone, find). No deviations in casing or verb style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each maps to a discrete workflow step with no filler. The count feels deliberately scoped to the contribution lifecycle rather than padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers discovery, repo-policy intake, briefing, setup, diagnostics, claiming, tone, pre-submit review, and PR review commentary. Deliberately omits automated posting (human stays in the loop), leaving only minor gaps such as a way to locate repos or matching to review history.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources