contribos
Related Servers
Alternatives to contribos
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGuides AI agents through open-source contribution workflows, from finding issues to submitting PRs, while keeping decision-making and coding with the human contributor.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceOpen source contribution manager — tracks PRs across repos, discovers contributable issues, diagnoses CI failures, and drafts maintainer responses. 21 MCP tools, 5 resources, 3 prompts. Ships as CLI, MCP server, and Claude Code plugin.2026MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to vet a GitHub issue before committing time to it, returning a landability verdict (GO, RISKY, TAKEN, GATED, STALE) plus repo friction scores, gate evidence, and ranked scans of a repository's starter issues. Also exposes contribution automation tools that draft claim comments, prep a fork and branch with a repo-specific checklist, and open a pull request once basics like DCO sign-off pass, with all writes dry-run by default.1,785 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to evaluate real OSS contribution opportunities by scoring issues on availability, competing PRs, staleness, and maintainer sentiment, including live feasibility checks for any repository.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables developers to find personalized open-source contributions by analyzing GitHub profiles and matching them with relevant 'good first issues' and beginner-friendly repositories. Provides comprehensive contribution tooling including repository health scoring, setup difficulty assessment, impact estimation, and automated PR planning.2222 PyPI37MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to audit git diffs, scan for leaked secrets and unsafe APIs, detect breaking changes, triage issues, generate changelogs, and assess repository hygiene through native stdio JSON-RPC tools.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool targets a distinct stage of the contribution workflow (find, policy, brief, setup, diagnose, claim, tone, check, review). Overlaps like check-vs-review and claim-vs-tone are resolved by the descriptions, which clearly bound one to pre-submit local work and the other to open PRs, and one to drafting versus checking text.
Every tool follows the identical contribos_verb pattern with a single lowercase word (policy, brief, setup, diagnose, check, review, claim, tone, find). No deviations in casing or verb style.
Nine tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each maps to a discrete workflow step with no filler. The count feels deliberately scoped to the contribution lifecycle rather than padded.
The surface covers discovery, repo-policy intake, briefing, setup, diagnostics, claiming, tone, pre-submit review, and PR review commentary. Deliberately omits automated posting (human stays in the loop), leaving only minor gaps such as a way to locate repos or matching to review history.