sx_un_audit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

无标注，描述需自行披露行为。'反审核'意为取消审核，属于修改操作，但描述未说明副作用、可逆性或对数据的影响，仅提及被守卫拒绝这一限制。行为透明度显著不足。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述极短且无冗余，但信息量过少，并非有效的简洁而是严重缺省。结构上可以接受，但内容不足以支持使用。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

没有输出模式，参数无说明，行为无细节，且是修改型工具，描述完全不足以让代理安全、正确地调用。缺乏基本必要信息。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

模式覆盖率为0%，描述未解释任何参数（form_id、data_id）的含义或用途。即使模式只有参数名，描述也完全没有补充信息，参数语义完全缺失。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确表明这是'反审核单据'，动词（反审核）和资源（单据）具体，且提到了官方名称'unAudit'。虽然未明确与其他工具区分，但目的基本清晰。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述仅提到'默认被只读守卫拒绝'，暗示可能需要权限但未说明何时使用此工具、有何前提或替代方案。缺少使用时机和排除条件。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.