sx_list_working_hours

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says '查询' (query), implying a read operation, but provides no details about pagination, ordering, filtering behavior, or limitations. Nothing beyond the bare query action is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, only two short clauses, with no wasted words. However, brevity comes at the expense of substance; it lacks structure and essential context. It is not overlong, but it is under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 8 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly inadequate. It does not explain parameter semantics, return values, or any operational details, leaving an agent unable to make informed calls without external knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no information about any of the 8 parameters. The mention of '分录标识' (entry identifier) does not map to any parameter. The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('查询' query) and a clear resource ('工时填报' working hour filling), along with the business object code and entry identifier, which helps distinguish it from sibling list tools like sx_list_projects or sx_list_reimbursements. It is clear enough but does not go beyond the name's implied meaning.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no context for typical use cases, and no mention of prerequisites or exclusions. The description simply restates the query purpose without directing the agent to consider other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.