Skip to main content
Glama
achuthc1298

Fastcat Literature MCP

by achuthc1298

Related Servers

Alternatives to Fastcat Literature MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to build and query a project-local literature database by ingesting papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed, arXiv, and OpenAlex, caching open-access PDFs, extracting full text, ranking results, and exposing MCP tools for search, seeds, feedback, and pipeline status over stdio.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides local academic literature search and writing support by querying OpenAlex, arXiv, and Crossref, downloading open-access PDFs, extracting IMRaD sections, and appending BibTeX references.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching ArXiv, fetching and indexing papers, and querying a personal paper library using vectorless RAG with BM25 and contextual compression, all without GPU or embedding models.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local academic research assistant that indexes PDFs into a searchable vector library and exposes MCP tools for semantic search, claim extraction, contradiction detection, and multi-step research synthesis.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables end-to-end research paper workflows from ideation to delivery, including paper reproduction, guided writing, export to LaTeX/PDF/DOCX, and scientific data queries across 41 public database connectors, all operable locally without API keys.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the literature workflow: external candidate search, ranking save, publisher-specific download, indexing, semantic retrieval, passage reading, paper listing, legacy extraction, summary reading, and configuration check. Overlaps such as search_papers vs retrieve_evidence are clearly separated by external vs local scope, and extract_paper is explicitly marked legacy and discouraged.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case with a clear verb_noun or verb_noun_phrase pattern (index_papers, retrieve_evidence, download_elsevier_paper, check_configuration). The convention is consistent across the entire set with no mixed casing or stylistic breaks.

    Tool Count5/5

    The 11 tools are well-scoped for a literature RAG server, covering search, download, indexing, retrieval, ranking, and optional legacy summarization without excessive surface area. Each tool has a clear role in the workflow, and the optional legacy tool does not bloat the set.

    Completeness4/5

    The core scholarly RAG lifecycle is well covered: external search, ranking, publisher-specific full-text download, indexing, evidence retrieval, passage reading, and optional summarization. Minor gaps exist around generic publisher support, index deletion/cleanup, and metadata export, but agents can work around them for the stated workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues