safari_list_indexed_dbs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description needs to disclose behavioral traits. It states a read operation but does not cover edge cases (e.g., empty list, page without IndexedDB support) or return format. Adequate for a simple action but could be more transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no redundant information. It is front-loaded with the key action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is mostly adequate. However, it does not hint at the return format (e.g., an array of database names), which would help the agent interpret results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so the description does not need to add meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and the resource ('all IndexedDB databases') with a specific context ('on the current page'). It effectively distinguishes this tool from the sibling 'safari_get_indexed_db' by indicating it returns a list rather than a single entry.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (listing vs. getting specific db) but lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives like 'safari_get_indexed_db'. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.