safari_import_storage

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It states the tool restores storage but omits critical details: does it overwrite existing data? Are there side effects? Is it destructive? This gap could lead to unintended state changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that efficiently conveys the main purpose. It is front-loaded and wastes no words. However, it could benefit from slight restructuring to separate usage context from behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple single-parameter schema and no output schema, the description is adequate but not complete. It lacks details on return behavior, potential failure modes, and whether the operation is reversible. More context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with a description. The tool description adds 'from safari_export_storage' to clarify source, but this is minimal enhancement. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema does most of the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: importing storage state from JSON, and specifies what is restored (cookies, localStorage, sessionStorage). It also names the complementary export tool, making it distinct from siblings like delete or set storage tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after safari_export_storage but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. It does not mention prerequisites, potential overwrites, or alternatives, which would help an AI agent decide between this and related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.