A
licenseC
qualityB
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that lets you drive PyMOL with natural language, enabling structure loading, analytical views, measurements, and protein exploration through AI assistants.
100
15
MIT
BioMCP
by acashmoney
Related Servers
Alternatives to BioMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides access to the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database through a rich set of tools and resources for protein structure prediction analysis.1935-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing programmatic access to 3D protein structural data from RCSB PDB, PDBe, and UniProt, enabling search, retrieval, comparison, and analysis of protein structures.1435Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables advanced PubMed literature search, citation formatting, and research analysis through natural language interactions.1210MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for interacting with the STRING database to analyze protein-protein interaction networks and functional enrichment. It enables users to map protein identifiers, retrieve interaction data, and generate biological network visualizations through natural language interfaces.113BSD 3-Clause
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for protein binder design using BindCraft via Docker, enabling structure prediction, sequence optimization, and scoring.2-
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one analyzes protein structures (active sites), while the other searches for disease-related proteins. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool based on the task.
Naming Consistency4/5
Both tools use a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., analyze-active-site, search-disease-proteins). This naming scheme is readable and predictable, though with only two tools, it's hard to assess full consistency across a larger set.
Tool Count2/5
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a bioinformatics domain, which typically involves more operations like sequence alignment, structure prediction, or data retrieval. This limited set may not cover common workflows adequately.
Completeness2/5
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a bioinformatics server. It lacks basic operations such as fetching protein sequences, aligning sequences, predicting structures, or managing datasets. This will likely cause agent failures in handling typical tasks in this domain.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues