Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_requirementC

A requirement (use-case flow, e.g. UC10S1) with the other flows of its use case.

search_codeB

Find classes by what they do. Returns class names, packages and purposes.

read_classC

A class's package, comment and method signatures.

related_classesC

Project classes a class uses and the classes that use it, from the call graph.

propose_linkA

Propose that a class implements a requirement. It goes to the review queue, not the trace matrix.

trace_matrixC

Reviewed and accepted links: requirement id -> classes.

coverage_gapsC

Requirements with no accepted link yet.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: requirement lookup, code search, class reading, related-class traversal, link proposal, accepted trace inspection, and gap detection. The boundary between proposed links and accepted trace-matrix links is especially clear.

Naming Consistency4/5

All names use consistent snake_case and are readable. Some are verb-led (get_requirement, search_code, read_class, propose_link) while others are noun phrases (trace_matrix, coverage_gaps), which is a minor deviation from a strict verb_noun pattern.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a traceability-focused server. Each tool covers a meaningful part of the workflow without obvious redundancy.

Completeness3/5

The surface covers requirement lookup, code exploration, link proposal, trace inspection, and gap analysis. However, there is no way to list or search requirements, and proposed links go to a review queue with no tool to inspect or accept/reject them, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues