Skip to main content
Glama
aaryanpallath

tracewise-mcp

by aaryanpallath
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to tracewise-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • code-rag-mcp

      nicksulia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform hybrid semantic and lexical code search across multiple repositories, retrieve symbol definitions and call hierarchies, and manage repository relations through MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0

    • arch-viewer

      axumquant
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI-powered architecture analysis and visualization of codebases, exposing 17 MCP tools for querying components, dependencies, and generating interactive diagrams.
      16 npm
      5
      MIT

    • ACE-MCP

      0215AndrewFeng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to perform local code search, indexing, and analysis across Java, JavaScript/TypeScript, .NET/C#, and Python projects through the MCP protocol.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • trazabilidad-mcp

      lucadevv
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes code tracing capabilities including journey flows, HTTP seams, and findings from indexed projects, allowing AI assistants to query software architecture.
      -

    • Cortex

      Remskill
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to semantically search and retrieve relevant code patterns, documentation, and implementations from a codebase via MCP tools.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: requirement lookup, code search, class reading, related-class traversal, link proposal, accepted trace inspection, and gap detection. The boundary between proposed links and accepted trace-matrix links is especially clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case and are readable. Some are verb-led (get_requirement, search_code, read_class, propose_link) while others are noun phrases (trace_matrix, coverage_gaps), which is a minor deviation from a strict verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a traceability-focused server. Each tool covers a meaningful part of the workflow without obvious redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers requirement lookup, code exploration, link proposal, trace inspection, and gap analysis. However, there is no way to list or search requirements, and proposed links go to a review queue with no tool to inspect or accept/reject them, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources