apply-effect-template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention whether applying a template replaces or merges existing effects, if there are side effects on layer properties, or error conditions (e.g., invalid template name). This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundant information, efficient and front-loaded with the core action. Every word contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 4 parameters including a nested object and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits critical context: what constitutes a template, how to discover available templates, the role of customSettings, and expected return values or confirmation. The agent lacks enough info to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with adequate property descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, which already documents all parameters. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema does the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (apply) and resource (predefined effect template) and target (layer in After Effects). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like apply-effect and apply-preset, but does not explain what a 'template' is versus a preset or raw effect, preventing a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as apply-effect or apply-preset. The description does not specify prerequisites, appropriate contexts, or exclusions, leaving the agent without decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.