No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have mostly distinct purposes: running a simulation, parsing peak flow, parsing continuity tables, and comparing continuity between two reports. The only mild overlap is between swmm_continuity and swmm_compare, since both concern continuity, but their descriptions clearly distinguish single-file parsing from two-file comparison.
All tools share the swmm_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case, giving a predictable namespace. The only minor inconsistency is grammatical form: swmm_peak and swmm_continuity are nouns while swmm_compare and swmm_run are verbs, though the names remain clear and readable.
Four tools is a small but reasonable set for a focused SWMM workflow, and each tool serves a clear role in running or evaluating a model. It is slightly narrow, but not so thin that the surface feels incomplete for the stated purpose.
The surface covers the core run-and-check workflow: execute SWMM, extract peak flow, inspect continuity, and compare continuity across reports. However, it lacks tools for other common report outputs such as outfall loading summaries, node/link summaries, flooding, or reading the generated manifest, leaving notable gaps for broader model evaluation.