zetrix_sdk_create_account

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It implies a write operation ('Create') but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether this requires authentication, what happens on failure (e.g., error handling), or if it has side effects like generating keys. The description is minimal and misses critical operational details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the key action ('Create a new Zetrix account') and adds necessary context ('using the official SDK'), making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of account creation (a write operation with potential side effects), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It lacks details on success/failure outcomes, error handling, or any behavioral context, leaving significant gaps for an AI agent to use it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't add parameter details, which is acceptable here, but it could have mentioned if any implicit parameters (like SDK context) are required, though not strictly necessary.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('new Zetrix account'), and specifies the method ('using the official SDK'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'zetrix_create_keypair' by focusing on account creation rather than key generation, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with all siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'zetrix_create_keypair' or 'zetrix_get_account'. The description lacks context about prerequisites, such as needing SDK setup or network connectivity, and doesn't mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.