Related Servers

The tool set has clear thematic grouping (e.g., crypto, account, contract, SDK, WebSocket), but there is notable overlap within groups. For example, zetrix_get_account, zetrix_get_account_base, and zetrix_get_balance all retrieve account-related data with subtle distinctions that could confuse agents. Similarly, multiple contract call tools (zetrix_call_contract, zetrix_sdk_call_contract) and transaction submission tools (zetrix_submit_transaction, zetrix_ws_submit_transaction) have overlapping purposes, though descriptions provide some guidance.

Tool names follow a highly consistent pattern throughout: all start with 'zetrix_' prefix, use snake_case uniformly, and employ a verb_noun structure (e.g., zetrix_get_balance, zetrix_create_keypair). Minor deviations like 'zetrix_multi_query' (adjective_verb_noun) are rare and do not disrupt readability, maintaining excellent predictability across all 44 tools.

With 44 tools, the server is overly broad and heavy for a single MCP server, likely covering multiple domains (blockchain interaction, smart contract development, cryptography, WebSocket management). This high count increases complexity and cognitive load for agents, making it difficult to navigate efficiently. A more modular approach with separate servers for distinct functionalities would be more appropriate.

The tool surface is extensive and covers core blockchain operations comprehensively, including account management, transaction handling, contract development, and real-time updates. However, there are minor gaps: for instance, tools for updating or deleting accounts are missing, and some advanced contract management features (e.g., contract deployment or upgrade) are not explicitly covered, though the provided guides and generation tools mitigate this.