Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FigTreeKit-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate iTOL phylogenetic tree visualization workflows, including tree inspection, taxonomy and monophyly analysis, annotation template generation, batch uploads, and export through 33 tools, 3 resources, and 2 prompts.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes the 7-prime spine, 7 κ-bands, and 6 fold operations from foldkit as MCP tools and resources for integration with AI assistants.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes the NGS360 bioinformatics platform REST API as MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to manage sequencing runs, projects, workflows, and more through natural language.
      82
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query, validate, and safely update GEDCOM family-history files through a local MCP server with read-only tools and reviewable changesets.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is meaningful overlap between style_tree and apply_config (both apply a config plus operations and export Nexus), and the collapse_clade/collapse_group/collapse_rank trio requires careful reading to distinguish. run_figtreekit_cli also shadows nearly every other tool as an escape hatch. Descriptions do clarify intent, but an agent must parse them closely to avoid misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_environment, highlight_clade, collapse_rank, validate_tree). Minor deviations exist: taxonomy_completeness is noun-only, cross_validate is verb_verb, and setup_ vs set_ prefixes coexist. The overall convention is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools falls in the borderline 16-25 band and feels heavy for a single MCP server, even for a broad tree-analysis domain. Several areas could be consolidated, such as the three collapse variants and style_tree/apply_config. Each tool has a plausible role, but the surface is larger than ideal.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: setup/check, rendering, annotation add/clear, taxonomy analysis, monophyly checks, cross-validation, summarization, validation, export, styling and a full CLI escape hatch. Minor gaps in direct tree-shape operations (e.g., reroot, prune, rotate) can be worked around via run_figtreekit_cli. The lifecycle for core tree-styling and analysis workflows is well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues