Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to WPS Office MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables reading and searching documents in allowlisted folders via LiteLLM and MCP tools, using COM for Office files to support IRM-protected content.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Windows to drive real Microsoft Word and WPS Office applications through COM, automating legacy .doc/.docx batch conversion, bookmark and placeholder template filling, print-fidelity PDF export, extraction from legacy binaries, editing of documents currently open on screen, and mail-merge batch generation. It hardens these operations with CJK font preservation, password and corruption pre-checks, structured self-correcting errors, path allowlisting, read-only mode, and automatic Word-to-WPS failover.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables secure static analysis of Microsoft Office documents and related file types for malicious content, integrating with systems that support the MCP protocol.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Universal MCP bridge and desktop manager for live, in-place manipulation of active WPS Office and Microsoft Office (Excel, Word, PowerPoint) documents without uploading files. Supports macOS & Windows.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to read, search, edit, and create Excel, Word, and PowerPoint files through MCP, including sheet/table operations, slide and chart creation, text replacement, and automatic backups.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools overlap heavily: wps_check_connection, wps_common_ping, and wps_common_wire_check all test connectivity; wps_get_active_document duplicates wps_word_get_active_document; wps_get_cell_value duplicates wps_excel_get_cell_value. Word/PPT find functions and paragraph/text retrieval are distinct, but these redundancies create real selection risk.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case and mostly follow wps_<domain>_<verb>_<object>, but older generic tools like wps_get_active_document, wps_get_cell_value, and wps_check_connection lack domain prefixes, while wps_ppt_find_ppt_text is redundantly worded. The pattern is readable but not consistently applied.

    Tool Count2/5

    29 tools is above the 25+ threshold and feels heavy, especially since several tools are near-duplicates (ping/check_connection/wire_check, active_document variants, cell_value variants) and could be consolidated or removed. It is not egregiously over-scoped for three Office applications, but it is larger than needed.

    Completeness2/5

    The surface is almost entirely read/inspection-oriented: it can locate and read content, but cannot modify cells, edit documents, update presentations, create files, or fill the fields that its own find tools are meant to identify. For an Office automation MCP, the inability to make any changes is a significant gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues