Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to blendermcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables remote control of Blender through MCP, allowing code execution, scene manipulation, rendering, and file transfer in a containerized environment.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects MCP-compatible clients to a live Blender scene for AI-assisted 3D workflows, enabling inspection and controlled operations on objects, materials, cameras, lights, render settings, animation, UVs, Geometry Nodes, imports, exports, and Python execution.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe, repeatable preparation of game characters in Blender through high-level MCP tools for validation, import, normalization, action renaming, and GLB export, with dry-run by default and loopback-only security.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A headless-first Model Context Protocol server for safe, deterministic Blender automation, exposing typed tools to inspect scenes and render previews without arbitrary command execution.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe, structured control of Blender on Windows via a standalone STDIO MCP server, providing seven tools to inspect scenes, list and edit materials, transform objects, add modifiers, set smooth shading, and export assets without arbitrary code execution.
      7
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 173 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes with clear descriptions, though a few pairs like set_geonode_input vs set_geonodes_input could cause confusion without careful reading. The majority are well-separated by resource type and action.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is verb_noun (e.g., list_objects, create_material), but a few tools like camera_look_at and playback_control deviate to noun_verb. The naming is generally predictable and readable, with only minor inconsistencies.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 173 tools, this far exceeds the threshold for an extreme mismatch (50+). While Blender is complex, this server attempts to cover every conceivable feature, making the surface unwieldy and difficult for agents to navigate effectively.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is remarkably broad, covering objects, materials, modifiers, animation, physics, node systems (shader, geometry, compositor), sculpting, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., manual UV editing, advanced painting), but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues