Skip to main content
Glama

evaluate_model

Assess a trained model's accuracy and reliability using cross-validation, detailed metrics, and statistical significance tests.

Instructions

Evaluate a single trained model with comprehensive metrics and cross-validation

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
model_pathYesPath to the trained model file (.pkl)
dataset_nameNoName of the loaded dataset for evaluation
dataset_pathNoPath to the evaluation dataset file - alternative to dataset_name
target_columnYesName of the target/label column
cv_foldsNoNumber of cross-validation folds
enable_statistical_testsNoPerform statistical significance tests
significance_levelNoSignificance level for statistical tests
generate_learning_curvesNoGenerate learning curves
detailed_metricsNoCalculate detailed metrics and reports
scoring_metricsNoList of scoring metrics for evaluation
learning_curve_train_sizesNoTraining sizes for learning curves
save_resultsNoSave evaluation results
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'evaluate' and 'comprehensive metrics' but does not specify side effects (e.g., logging, saving, state changes) or whether the operation is read-only. The parameter 'save_results' hints at side effects, but it is not mentioned in the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that conveys the core purpose. It could be slightly more structured (e.g., listing key features), but it is appropriately sized and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (12 parameters, many with defaults, and no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain what the return value or output includes, nor how to interpret the results. Sibling tools like 'compare_models' or 'get_model_info' suggest the need for clearer differentiation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions; it does not clarify which parameters are key or provide example values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'evaluate', the resource 'a single trained model', and specifies 'comprehensive metrics and cross-validation', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'train_model' or 'compare_models'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lacks any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., a trained model must exist) or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer context from sibling names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Yasserelhaddar/MCP-DS-Toolkit-Server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server