MCP DS Toolkit Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": true
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| load_datasetB | Load a dataset from various sources: uploaded files (full path), data directory (filename), URLs, or sklearn datasets |
| validate_datasetC | Validate dataset quality and check for issues |
| profile_datasetB | Generate comprehensive data profile and statistics |
| preprocess_datasetC | Apply preprocessing transformations to dataset |
| clean_datasetB | Clean dataset by handling missing values and outliers |
| split_datasetC | Split dataset into train/validation/test sets |
| list_datasetsB | List all loaded datasets with their metadata |
| get_dataset_infoA | Get detailed information about a specific dataset |
| compare_datasetsC | Compare structure and statistics of two datasets |
| batch_process_datasetsB | Apply the same operation to multiple datasets |
| sample_datasetB | Create a sample from a dataset |
| export_datasetC | Export dataset to file |
| remove_datasetA | Remove a dataset from memory and optionally delete files |
| clear_all_dataB | Clear all datasets and cached data from current session |
| train_modelB | Train a machine learning model with configurable persistence (memory-only, filesystem, or hybrid storage) |
| evaluate_modelB | Evaluate a single trained model with comprehensive metrics and cross-validation |
| compare_modelsB | Compare multiple trained models on the same dataset with statistical significance testing |
| tune_hyperparametersB | Perform comprehensive hyperparameter tuning for a model with various search strategies |
| get_model_infoC | Get detailed information about a trained model including metadata and performance |
| list_algorithmsB | List all available machine learning algorithms with descriptions |
| create_experimentB | Create a new experiment for organizing runs |
| start_runB | Start a new run within an experiment |
| log_paramsC | Log parameters to the current run |
| log_metricsC | Log metrics to the current run |
| log_artifactB | Log an artifact (file) to the current run |
| end_runC | End the current run |
| list_experimentsC | List all experiments |
| get_experimentB | Get details of a specific experiment |
| list_runsC | List runs from an experiment |
| compare_runsC | Compare multiple runs |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| analyze_dataset | Analyze an uploaded dataset using the MCP Data Science Toolkit |
| ml_workflow_guide | Guide for end-to-end ML workflow using the MCP Data Science Toolkit |
| model_comparison | Compare different models for a specific task |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but 'compare_runs' is vague compared to more specific comparisons like 'compare_models' and 'compare_datasets', and 'preprocess_dataset' could overlap slightly with 'clean_dataset' and 'validate_dataset' though descriptions help differentiate.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., clean_dataset, train_model, log_metrics), making the set predictable and easy to navigate.
With 30 tools, the set is on the heavy side but each tool addresses a specific aspect of data science workflows (data ops, modeling, experiment tracking). While some tools could be consolidated, the count is still reasonable for a comprehensive toolkit.
The tool set covers major lifecycle steps from data loading to model evaluation and experiment tracking, but lacks a delete_model tool and explicit feature engineering or data merging capabilities, leaving minor but notable gaps.