A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server that enables Claude to control your computer, similar to Anthropic's computer use but easy to set up locally.
782 npm
382
MIT
Screen Control
by Xeakaes
Related Servers
Alternatives to Screen Control
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal MCP server for Gateway-managed computer use that exposes computer.* tools with desktop control, OCR, and user-visible safety overlays.6 npm1MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local, dependency-free MCP server that gives AI agents controlled access to the active Windows desktop, enabling automated interaction with applications through screenshots, clicks, typing, and window management.102 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to see and operate a Windows PC through mouse, keyboard, screenshots, OCR, window control, and shell commands.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAllows AI clients to see and control Windows 10/11 desktops via MCP, with screenshots, UI Automation, Chrome CDP, keyboard/mouse, and terminal using semantic element targeting.30541 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to capture screenshots, control mouse/keyboard, and manage windows on desktop platforms, primarily Windows, via an MCP server.161MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control a Windows PC via MCP, including launching apps, managing windows, driving keyboard and mouse, reading the screen with OCR, and monitoring system state, with multi-agent locking and a local dashboard for confirmation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to capture multi-monitor screenshots with coordinate grids and perform mouse, keyboard, scrolling, dragging, and window-management actions on Windows via MCP tools or CLI. It provides pixel-accurate desktop automation for computer-use agents.MIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 16 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct mechanism—screen capture, OCR, motion detection, global input, window-specific input, window introspection, and game mode. Potentially similar tools like ocr_screen and window_capture_ocr are cleanly separated by foreground screen versus background window. No two tools appear to do the same job.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a readable snake_case convention with verb-first names like list_windows, focus_window, close_window, and release_all. A few noun-style names like mouse, keyboard, and game, plus window_post and window_capture_ocr, are minor deviations but still clear and predictable.
Tool Count4/5
Sixteen tools is on the higher end but each earns its place across capture, OCR, input, window management, and game mode. The count feels slightly heavy but remains well-scoped for a desktop automation server.
Completeness4/5
Core workflows are well covered: screen capture, OCR, change detection, global and background input, window discovery, focusing, posting, and closing. Minor gaps like querying the current cursor position or window geometry are absent but most operations have workarounds.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues