Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to protect-context

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP knowledge server that gives agents a filesystem-shaped store of rules, context, skills, and granted connections — opened in full for standing rules and as an index otherwise, then listed, searched, and read on demand. Agents can only propose diffs and new entries (reviewable and correctable by the owner) and receive credentials for exactly the connections they're bound to.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Saves decisions, rules, bugs, to-dos and failed approaches from coding-agent chats as lines in a repo file, then brings the relevant ones back in later sessions. It also checks planned commands and file edits against those saved rules before they run, asking first when a rule might be broken.
      169 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and tools to share durable, approved knowledge, current decisions, task ownership, and handoffs from a local-first workspace kept outside any single AI product. Markdown holds human-readable rules, goals, and narratives while SQLite tracks agents, sessions, tasks, leases, and audit events behind one transport-independent core.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run disciplined hunts over public data, enforcing evidence ledgers, calibration controls, novelty checks against catalogues and literature, and fresh-eyes review before any claim is trusted. Human-only decisions such as waivers and expert attestations stay out of reach of the agent.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables agents to resolve routine typed routing, loop-stall arbitration, and tool safety checks locally instead of invoking a frontier LLM, returning schema-enforced decision outputs and telemetry at sub-millisecond latency. Also provides reversible execution checkpoints, token budgets, and decay-based episodic memory for safe, privacy-preserving autonomous operation.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct roles (verify vs. note vs. contract mutate different stores), and descriptions carefully delineate read/write boundaries such as guard_evidence vs. guard_recall vs. guard_journal. The main soft overlap is the aggregate view tools — guard_status, guard_budget, guard_loop_check, and guard_diff_audit all surface session/diff telemetry, so an agent may hesitate over which one answers a given question.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses the same guard_ prefix with lowercase snake_case and a compact noun/noun-phrase form (guard_diff_audit, guard_loop_check, guard_orientation). No camelCase, no stray prefixes, and the pattern is entirely predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools sits comfortably in the well-scoped range for a session-guardian server. Each tool maps to a distinct store or check (contract, journal, evidence, budget, diff, preflight), so none feel padded.

    Completeness4/5

    Lifecycle coverage is strong: contract is list/add/remove, journal is write/read/search, evidence is record/list/inspect, plus status, budget, diff, loop, and orientation checks. Minor gaps remain — no way to remove or prune recorded evidence, and no explicit session reset/clear operation — but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues