List recent Claude Code sessions with optional project filtering and result limit.
List recent Claude Code sessions that Longhand has indexed.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max results (default 20) | |
| project | No | Filter by project path substring |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description offers only the vague term 'recent' without defining it. It does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, what ordering is used, or any other behavioral traits, putting the full burden on the description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the key action and resource, making it efficient for quick scanning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool with two optional parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacking. It does not explain what a session is, what fields are returned, or any default time range, leaving important gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage for both parameters, so the description does not need to add much. However, 'recent' provides minimal extra context that is not parameter-specific, but the description adds no meaningful semantics beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists 'recent Claude Code sessions that Longhand has indexed,' with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_session_timeline or get_latest_events, which also relate to sessions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as search or find_commits. The description does not mention context, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent without decision criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.